Let`s transfer the installation (if any) and the company Let`s look at the BOOT mechanism in the same simple example with two IT companies. If they chose the BOOT model instead of the BOT, the group of people involved in developing and testing models should have been used by the exporting company as a slot machine for the return of the money invested in this project. Therefore, the benefits of Build-Operate transfer are also a good thing, but the investment and return model is chosen individually for each project. In summary, it should be noted that if you decide to use the described model of Build-Operate transfer services to create your own R&D center or improve your business in another way, you should pay attention to Ukraine. At least once in your life, you have heard the famous phrase "divide and rule." But have you ever heard of the Build-Operate transfer? Yes, it is not quite a principle of public administration, but this term is worth understanding in order to know how modern project financing works and what the benefits are. In this article, we will tell you what BOT is, in which sectors it is popular and which companies use this model. In addition, we will look at some clear examples of such projects, model contracts and options to find a company with a talent pool to hire fintech developers or a team of experts who are proficient in a particular technology stack. Let`s start from the beginning. The UNITED NATIONS ESCAP tells us that the fundamental characteristics of the build-operate transfer model are an agreement between the parties, a fixed period for the execution of commitments and the return of ownership after its cessation. In another list of key features of the World PPP Bank, there are a number of variants of the basic BOT model. Under boot contracts (transfer of Build-Own-Operate), the contractor owns the project for the duration of the project. Under Build-Lease (BLT) lease transfer agreements, the government leases the project to the contractor for the duration of the project and operates it. Other variants both designed the contractor and built the project.

An example is a DBOT contract (transfer of design construction operations). A large number of BOT port and road projects have been implemented in the region. The Nhava Sheva International Container Terminal (NSICT) is an interesting example of improving efficiency through a BOT project in the port sector. In 1997, the Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust (JNPT), India, signed an agreement with a consortium led by P&O Australia for the development of a BOT-based twin-bed container terminal for 30 years, at a price of $200 million. P&O closed the project before the dementia date and began operating at the new terminal in 1999. From the first year of operation, the terminal handled much more traffic than expected. Private participation has also generated impressive efficiencies. Efficiency indicators such as average ship transhipment time and performance per day from port to terminal were comparable to other effectively managed ports in the region.

In 2003/2004, the average transhipment time for ships and containers was 2.04 and 1.84 days respectively, well above the corresponding indicators for other comparable terminals in the public sector. As you have already understood, the offer of build operate transfer is widespread in the it sector and in these sectors in general. This model has become very popular due to its convenience, reduced costs, risk, time and resources. This model can be compared to the flow of DIY, which means creating everything you need with your own hands. Including the tools to create something....